Computer networks are hard to manage. Given a set of high-level requirements (e.g., connectivity, security, reliability), networks operators have to coordinate the individual behavior of potentially thousands of devices running complex distributed protocols so that they, collectively, compute a compatible forwarding state. If this was not hard enough, even specifying the behavior of a single device is hard as operators can only rely on low-level (and quite arcane) configuration languages which vary not only across vendors, but also across devices type. Not surprisingly, this obvious complexity leads to many human mistakes. Actually, it has been shown that the majority of the network downtimes are caused by humans, not equipment failures.
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) has emerged in the recent years as a way to radically change this situation, by making networks programmable from a single (logical) vantage point. Specifically, network programmability is concerned with developing high-level programming interfaces to specify network-wide forwarding behavior along with compilers and controller systems that enforce these requirements at runtime by translating them into low-level instructions (e.g. forwarding entries, routing configurations, routing announcements). Managing a network this way enables operators to focus on what they want, rather than how to implement it.
In the last few years our group has taken pioneering steps to bring programmability into existing networks. With Fibbing, we showed how to program any network by leveraging internal routing protocols as programming interface. Fibbing won the SIGCOMM best paper award along with an Applied Networking Research Prize. With SDX, we brought programmability to Internet routing via Internet eXchange Points. SDX won the NSDI community award and few IXPs have trial deployments of the SDX controller. Finally, with SyNET, we proposed the first solution to the configuration synthesis problem involving multiple protocols.
Laurent Vanbever, USENIX NSDI 2018
Ahmed El-Hassany, CAV 2017
Stefano Vissicchio, ACM SIGCOMM 2015
USENIX NSDI 2020. Santa Clara, California, USA (February 2020).
USENIX NSDI 2020. Santa Clara, California, USA (February 2020).
ACM HotNets 2019. Princeton, NJ, USA (November 2019).
Traditional network control planes can be slow and require manual tinkering from operators to change their behavior. There is thus great interest in a faster, data-driven approach that uses signals from real-time traffic instead. However, the promise of fast and automatic reaction to data comes with new risks: malicious inputs designed towards negative outcomes for the network, service providers, users, and operators.
Adversarial inputs are a well-recognized problem in other areas; we show that networking applications are susceptible to them too. We characterize the attack surface of data-driven networks and examine how attackers with different privileges—from infected hosts to operator-level access—may target network infrastructure, applications, and protocols. To illustrate the problem, we present case studies with concrete attacks on recently proposed data-driven systems.
Our analysis urgently calls for a careful study of attacks and defenses in data-driven networking, with a view towards ensuring that their promise is not marred by oversights in robust design.
ACM HotNets 2018. Redmond, WA, USA (November 2018).
One design principle of modern network architecture seems to be set in stone: a software-based control plane drives a hardware- or software-based data plane. We argue that it is time to revisit this principle after the advent of programmable switch ASICs which can run complex logic at line rate.
We explore the possibility and benefits of accelerating the control plane by offloading some of its tasks directly to the network hardware. We show that programmable data planes are indeed powerful enough to run key control plane tasks including: failure detection and notification, connectivity retrieval, and even policy-based routing protocols. We implement in P4 a prototype of such a “hardware-accelerated” control plane, and illustrate its benefits in a case study.
Despite such benefits, we acknowledge that offloading tasks to hardware is not a silver bullet. We discuss its tradeoffs and limitations, and outline future research directions towards hardware-software codesign of network control planes.
USENIX NSDI 2018. Renton, Washington, USA (April 2018).
Network operators often need to adapt the configuration of a network in order to comply with changing routing policies. Evolving existing configurations, however, is a complex task as local changes can have unforeseen global effects. Not surprisingly, this often leads to mistakes that result in network downtimes. We present NetComplete, a system that assists operators in modifying existing network-wide configurations to comply with new routing policies. NetComplete takes as input configurations with “holes” that identify the parameters to be completed and “autocompletes” these with concrete values. The use of a partial configuration addresses two important challenges inherent to existing synthesis solutions: (i) it allows the operators to precisely control how configurations should be changed; and (ii) it allows the synthesizer to leverage the existing configurations to gain performance. To scale, NetComplete relies on powerful techniques such as counter-example guided inductive synthesis (for link-state protocols) and partial evaluation (for path-vector protocols). We implemented NetComplete and showed that it can autocomplete configurations using static routes, OSPF, and BGP. Our implementation also scales to realistic networks and complex routing policies. Among others, it is able to synthesize configurations for networks with up to 200 routers within few minutes.
CAV 2017. Heidelberg, Germany (July 2017).
Computer networks are hard to manage. Given a set of highlevel requirements (e.g., reachability, security), operators have to manually figure out the individual configuration of potentially hundreds of devices running complex distributed protocols so that they, collectively, compute a compatible forwarding state. Not surprisingly, operators often make mistakes which lead to downtimes.
To address this problem, we present a novel synthesis approach that automatically computes correct network configurations that comply with the operator’s requirements. We capture the behavior of existing routers along with the distributed protocols they run in stratified Datalog. Our key insight is to reduce the problem of finding correct input configurations to the task of synthesizing inputs for a stratified Datalog program. To solve this synthesis task, we introduce a new algorithm that synthesizes inputs for stratified Datalog programs. This algorithm is applicable beyond the domain of networks.
We leverage our synthesis algorithm to construct the first network-wide configuration synthesis system, called SyNET, that support multiple interacting routing protocols (OSPF and BGP) and static routes. We show that our system is practical and can infer correct input configurations, in a reasonable amount time, for networks of realistic size (>50 routers) that forward packets for multiple traffic classes.
ACM SOSR 2017. Santa Clara, CA, USA (April 2017).
Software-Defined Internet eXchange Points (SDXes) are recently gaining momentum, with several SDXes now running in production. The deployment of multiple SDXes on the Internet raises the question of whether the interactions between these SDXes will cause correctness problems, since SDX policies can deflect traffic away from the default BGP route for a prefix, effectively breaking the congruence between the control plane and data plane. Although one deflection on a path will never cause loops to occur, combining multiple deflections at different SDXes can lead to persistent forwarding loops that the control plane never sees.
In this paper, we introduce SIDR, a coordination framework that enables SDXes to verify the end-to-end correctness (i.e., loop freedom) of an SDX policy. The challenge behind SIDR is to strike a balance between privacy, scalability, and flexibility. SIDR addresses these challenges by: (i) not requiring SDXes to disclose the flow space their SDX policies act on, only the next-hop they deflect to; and (ii) minimizing the number of SDXes that must exchange state to detect correctness problems. SIDR manages to preserve the flexibility of SDX policies by activating the vast majority of the safe policies, the policies that do not create a loop. We implemented SIDR on the SDX platform and showed its practical effectiveness: SIDR can activate 91% of all safe policies while preserving privacy and scalability and can perform correctness checks in about one second.
Usenix NSDI 2016. Santa Clara, CA, USA (March 2016).
Arpit Gupta, Nick Feamster, Laurent Vanbever
ACM SOSR 2016. Santa Clara, CA, USA (March 2016).
Software Defined Internet Exchange Points (SDXes) increase the flexibility of interdomain traffic delivery on the Internet. Yet, an SDX inherently requires multiple participants to have access to a single, shared physical switch, which creates the need for an authorization mechanism to mediate this access. In this paper, we introduce a logic and mechanism called FLANC (A Formal Logic for Authorizing Network Control), which authorizes each participant to control forwarding actions on a shared switch and also allows participants to delegate forwarding actions to other participants at the switch (e.g., a trusted third party). FLANC extends “says” and “speaks for” logic that have been previously designed for operating system objects to handle expressions involving network traffic flows. We describe FLANC, explain how participants can use it to express authorization policies for realistic interdomain routing settings, and demonstrate that it is efficient enough to operate in operational settings
Stefano Vissicchio, Olivier Tilmans, Laurent Vanbever, Jennifer Rexford
ACM SIGCOMM 2015. London, UK (August 2015).
Media coverage: ipSpace
Stefano Vissicchio, Laurent Vanbever, Jennifer Rexford
ACM HotNets 2014. Los Angeles, CA, USA (October 2014).
Link-state routing protocols (e.g., OSPF and IS-IS) are widely used because they are scalable, robust, and based on simple abstractions. Unfortunately, these protocols are also relatively inflexible, since they direct all traffic over shortest paths. In contrast, Software Defined Networking (SDN) offers fine-grained control over routing, at the expense of controller overhead, failover latency, and deployment challenges.
We argue that future networks can achieve the benefits of both approaches through central control over the distributed route computation. The key idea, which we call Fibbing, is to have the controller trick the routers into seeing a fake topology that is carefully constructed to achieve the desired Forwarding Information Base (FIB). Given an acyclic forwarding graph for each destination, the controller computes an augmented topology with fake nodes (and destinations to announce there) and fake links (and link weights). The controller injects these "lies" into the link-state routing protocol, and the routers simply compute the paths accordingly. The controller can also select an augmented topology that triggers the use of specific backup paths when real links and routers fail. To reduce router load, our Fibbing algorithms compute augmented topologies of minimal size. Our preliminary evaluation on realistic ISP topologies shows that Fibbing works well in practice.
Arpit Gupta, Laurent Vanbever, Muhammad Shahbaz, Sean Donovan, Brandon Schlinker, Nick Feamster, Jennifer Rexford, Scott Shenker, Russ Clark, Ethan Katz-Bassett
ACM SIGCOMM 2014. Chicago, IL, USA (August 2014).
BGP severely constrains how networks can deliver traffic over the Internet. Today's networks can only forward traffic based on the destination IP prefix, by selecting among routes offered by their immediate neighbors. We believe Software Defined Networking (SDN) could revolutionize wide-area traffic delivery, by offering direct control over packet-processing rules that match on multiple header fields and perform a variety of actions. Internet exchange points (IXPs) are a compelling place to start, given their central role in interconnecting many networks and their growing importance in bringing popular content closer to end users.
To realize a Software Defined IXP (an "SDX"), we must create compelling applications, such as "application-specific peering"---where two networks peer only for (say) streaming video traffic. We also need new programming abstractions that allow participating networks to create and run these applications and a runtime that both behaves correctly when interacting with BGP and ensures that applications do not interfere with each other. Finally, we must ensure that the system scales, both in rule-table size and computational overhead. In this paper, we tackle these challenges and demonstrate the flexibility and scalability of our solutions through controlled and in-the-wild experiments. Our experiments demonstrate that our SDX implementation can implement representative policies for hundreds of participants who advertise full routing tables while achieving sub-second convergence in response to configuration changes and routing updates.